International, multicentre, observational study of fluid bolus therapy in neonates.

Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Department of Neonatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Medical and Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States. Department of Neonatology, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Mater Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Department of Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. NHS Blood and Transplant and Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2019;(6):632-639

Abstract

AIM: To assess the prevalence, types and indications for fluid bolus therapy in neonates with haemodynamic compromise. METHODS This was a pragmatic, international, multicentre observational study in neonatal units across Australasia, Europe and North America with a predefined study period of 10-15 study days per participating neonatal unit between December 2015 and March 2017. Infants ≤28 days of age who received a fluid bolus for the management of haemodynamic compromise (≥10 mL/kg given at ≤6 h) were included. RESULTS A total of 163 neonates received a bolus over 8479 eligible patient days in 41 neonatal units. Prevalence of fluid bolus therapy varied between centres from 0 to 28.6% of admitted neonates per day, with a pooled prevalence rate of 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9%). The most common fluid used was 0.9% sodium chloride (129/163; 79%), and the volume of fluid administered was most commonly 10 mL/kg (115/163; 71%) over a median of 30 min (interquartile range 20-60). The most frequent indications were hypotension (n = 56; 34%), poor perfusion (n = 20; 12%) and metabolic acidosis (n = 20; 12%). Minimal or no clinical improvement was reported by clinicians in 66 of 163 cases (40%). CONCLUSIONS Wide international variations in types, indications and effects of fluid bolus administration in haemodynamically compromised neonates suggest uncertainty in the risk-benefit profile. This is likely to reflect the lack of robust evidence to support the efficacy of different fluid types, doses and appropriate indications. Together, these highlight a need for further clinically relevant studies.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Multicenter Study ; Observational Study

Metadata